subscribe | stacks | shuffle

fyi

i'm brad. i love my wife and two boys. i'm executive pastor at bedford church of the nazarene near cleveland, ohio. what you'll read here are my thoughts, not my church's. don't blame them. i also do some freelance writing and editing.

tags

faith sites

brian mclaren
daily office
international justice mission
jason clark
jesus creed
nt wright
out of ur
rob bell
skye jethani
spend yourself

26 October 09

Three Upcoming Blog Posts

I’ve had three blog posts percolating over the last few weeks because of different happenings in my life. If I tell you (all two of you) that they’re coming, I’m much more likely to actually post them. Watch soon for:

  1. The Music of my Heritage
  2. The Wizard of Oz
  3. A Sports Pessimist No More
23 May 09

Pete Rose's Self-Made Prison

Several weeks ago, in response to some comment I made on Facebook, my friend Wes hollered at me about Pete Rose. Many of my friends holler at me about Pete Rose. (I grew up near and lived in Cincinnati for a while.) Then, when Manny got busted, my friend Timmy sent me this text message:

Manny. What a bum. Pete Rose forever!

And I thought to myself then, “I have to blog about Pete Rose.” Then, Dan Patrick randomly had Charlie Hustle on his radio show, and I was reminded again. So here we go.

There is so much to consider when it comes to Rose’s candidacy for the Hall of Fame. As baseball has always been known as a haven for statisticians, let’s look at his statistical merits. In the most traditional sense, most baseball fans look at things like Batting Average, Home Runs, and Runs Batted In when assessing someone statistically. On the list of all-time players, Rose ranks 172nd, 392nd, and 88th in those categories, respectively. Other categories considered by traditional fans are Base Hits, Runs Scored, and Stolen Bases. Rose is the all-time leader in Hits and places 6th in Runs Scored and 336th in Stolen Bases. In considering these statistical categories, a fair case could be made to put Rose in the Hall of Fame.

People who study baseball carefully, however, have learned that these traditional categories don’t always tell the whole story. Sabermetricians use less traditional categories to determine a player’s true value, statistics like OPS (On-Base Percentage Plus Slugging Percentage) and Runs Created. Rose ranks highly in the Runs Created category (9th all time) but quite poorly in OPS (525th).

Pete Rose was what I like to call a “Compiler:” a player who looks good statistically at the end of his career mostly because he had the good fortune of staying healthy and playing for many years. (Nolan Ryan and Cal Ripken both fall into the category, as well.) When you look at statistics that compile (Hits, Runs, Walks, etc.), Rose looks like one of the greatest players in history. But when you weigh the categories which are measured by percentages (On-Base Percentage, Slugging Percentage, Batting Average), it’s certainly debatable whether he is HOF material. (Incidentally, it’s not like he should apologize for being healthy and playing a long time…more power to him.)

Considering the intangibles is another story. Baseball has a tendency to allow players into the Hall of Fame who may not “measure up” statistically but who brought some intangible factor to the table. My favorite player of all time, Ozzie Smith, is a superb example of this. While Ozzie’s offensive numbers are nowhere near HOF material, he was the “greatest defensive player of all time.” Obviously, this is a rather subjective title. There are numbers to bear it out, but mostly he made the HOF on the merits of his Gold Glove awards, All-Star appearances, and general defensive dominance. The case for Rose is made much more easily using “intangibles:” Rose was on 17 All-Star teams, won an MVP, batted over .300 nearly every season, had a reputation for being a hustler, and is the game’s all-time leader in Hits, for Pete’s sake (pun intended). Using this argument, Rose probably belongs in the Hall of Fame.

Which brings us to Pete Rose’s X Factor: His propensity to gamble on baseball, and worse, on his own team.

[Let me be clear about one thing up front: Anything I say which may come across as soft on those caught using PEDs is anything but. I hate that three of the greatest players I ever saw in my life cheated and lied (are still lying) about it. I am not attempting to be light on PED users, only to relate their crime to that of Rose.]

One of the biggest arguments I keep hearing in favor of Rose being reinstated and placed on the HOF ballot is that, now that steroids have had their era, we have to let Pete in. After all, surely Bonds, Clemens, A-Rod, etc., will be allowed in, right? I don’t know how the HOF voters will deal with all the alleged steroid users, but I know how they’ve dealt with them to this point, and it hasn’t been pretty. I’d say it’s no guarantee the PED guys are going into the Hall.

There’s another, more troubling aspect of this argument though, and that is the idea that those using PEDs are worse than those gambling on the game. I think this is ludicrous.

“But wait!” you say. “Pete always bet on his own team!” I’m not sure how that really makes things any better. Pete Rose was betting a minimum of $10,000 daily on baseball games involving a team he was managing. This is unconscionable. Imagine the reasoning which may have gone on in his head: “Well, we’re down three going into the 9th. I’d love to win that 10 grand, but I’m gonna bet another 10 tomorrow night. I’ll save (fill in team’s best relief pitcher’s name here) until tomorrow so he’s fresh.” Rose always knew he would be betting big money on tomorrow’s game, and the one after that, and the one after that. This knowledge certainly impacted the way he managed, and it wasn’t always to win that night’s game, to be sure.

There are so many other issues here. Of course Rose said he only bet for his team to win, but why in the world should we believe him? He lied for years and years about the gambling, so why wouldn’t he lie about that? And his confession was….well…self-serving (I’m being kind.) Many sports figures have been smart enough to figure this out: If you get caught having screwed up, admit it, at least act like you’re sorry, and move on with your life. Sports fans, as a whole, are a forgiving bunch. Rose couldn’t handle this, though. Ten years after his banishment, he was chastising Jim Gray on national television, saying he wouldn’t admit to something that never happened. Then, in 2004, days after the Hall of Fame class was announced, Rose did an about-face. He admitted everything, agreed to interviews, wanted to come clean and get back into the game he loved so much. Oh…and he wrote a book about it, which was conveniently released at the same time. Was it an apology tour or a book tour? I can’t remember. Not only did his confession lack even the slightest sense of authenticity, but, as Rose was so often known to do, he had to make a buck with it.

I imagine there will be a day Pete Rose is allowed onto the ballot for baseball’s Hall of Fame. I’m not sure the voters will elect him, but that wouldn’t really shock me, either. If this happens in my lifetime, I’ll be a bit surprised. Whenever that day comes, I believe the Baseball Hall of Fame will be worse for it.

6 May 09
23 April 09

I’ve never been much of an NBA fan, at least not since the days of Dominique Wilkins and that funny Hawks logo. But now that I’m a Cleveland resident, I’m a full-fledged Cavs fan. And this video is funny.

Tags: sports humor
14 April 09

#10

I’ve made no qualms whatsoever about stealing stuff from my friend Petey, including this very blog design. Well, he came up with a fantastic idea. When he moved from Wordpress over to Tumblr, he decided to bring with him his top ten posts. I thought: “Brilliant.” Here’s my #10 from Blogger, posted 04 October 2005.


Costanza’s Wallet

Posted by BT

Friday night my wife and I had dinner with George Costanza. Well, not really. At a Japanese Steakhouse in Overland Park, we sat at a table with another couple, and they were quite unique. When the check came, the gentleman stood up and began wrestling to get something out of his pocket: His enormous, cantaloupe-sized wallet. This thing was amazing…It made Costanza’s look puny. If I were to guess the contents, I would include money, credit cards, receipts, car keys, a pickle spear, the Yellow Pages, and pictures of their grandkids, among much else, clearly. He set it on the table, unzipped it (yes, it had a zipper), and chose a few bills, placing them with the check. But he wasn’t done. After the waitress returned with his change, he proceeded to remove a calculator from his fanny pack (that’s right), along with the checkbook. At this time his wife got up and left…didn’t just go to the restroom, but left the restaurant entirely. We began to wonder if they were perhaps just on a date, but this seemed unlikely, as they had to be in their 60s. So he opened the checkbook and the calculator, and began crunching some numbers there at the table. He must have had 20 receipts folded up in the checkbook, and he added the one from dinner. After working with the calculator for a while, he folded up the checkbook, closed the calculator and returned them to his fanny pack. He then struggled mightily to return the gargantuan wallet to his pocket. Kari and I had to wonder why he didn’t keep the humongo wallet in the fanny pack, too.

The Playoffs
The Cardinals begin the Playoffs this afternoon, hosting the San Diego Padres in a best-of-five series. I can only hope for a happier ending than last year. But, should the RedBirds make it back to the Fall Classic, Dad and I will once again make the trek to St. Louis in hopes of not having our hearts broken in person, again.

Congratulations…
…are in order for my friends, Doug and Molly Wharton, who were wed this weekend in Columbus, Ohio. Doug and Molly live in Honduras, where they work at a place filled with hope for children with HIV/AIDS. It is called Montana de Luz, which means “Mountain of Light.” I invite you to read a speech Molly gave at their wedding, which was posted by my friend Eric Stetler, here. If you feel led, please support this mission in any way you possibly can.

And finally…
this from Sojourners.

Now Reading: The Death of Ivan Ilyich, by Leo Tolstoy
Cardinals’ Magic Number: 11


13 April 09

Outta Here | RIP Harry Kalas

I love baseball.

The fates have been especially cruel to my favorite game this week.

Last Thursday, 22-year-old Nick Adenhart died far too young. And earlier today, the game lost two of its most memorable personalities: Mark “The Bird” Fidrych, whose on-the-mound antics earned him much repute, and Harry Kalas, the 39-year veteran of the Philadelphis Philles broadcast booth, whose timeless voice is familiar to so many generations. Click here to listen to his call of the Phils’ World Series victory last year.

The St. Louis Cardinals have always been my favorite baseball team. With the news about Adnehart and Kalas in particular, my mind rushed back to June 2002. On June 18, the Cardinals lost their long-time voice, Jack Buck. Most people know Jack Buck for his call of Kirk Gibson’s dramatic “limp-off” home run in the 1988 World Series: “I don’t believe what I just saw!” For me, listening to 1120 KMOX would never be the same without the fabulous call: “That’s a winner.” That same day, June 18, a 33-year-old righthander named Darryl Kile pitched a gem for the Cardinals, dealing easily with the Anaheim Angels and leading the Redbirds into first place in the NL Central. They’d stay there the rest of the season.

Four short days later, I was at a wedding at the church where I was on staff. During the reception, I had turned on a TV in an office because the Cardinals and Cubs were playing the Fox Game of the Week. I’d run in every now and then to check the status of the game, and was increasingly confused as to why there would be a delay in getting started, with the sun shining bright over Chicago’s Wrigley Field. I’d learn why a few minutes later, when Joe Girardi addressed the Wrigley crowd with a shaky voice. Darryl Kile had been found dead in his hotel room. Jack Buck’s son, Joe, was in the Fox broadcast booth that day at Wrigley.

I’m a pretty emotional guy. I’ve seen Field of Dreams 472 times (hyperbole alert), and I always cry at the “Dad…you wanna have a catch?” scene (no hyperbole there). But I find this interesting: My favorite sports teams (all of which I proudly inherited from my Dad, by the way) have all won a championship within the last decade. In 1998, Tennessee won the college football title. In 2006, the Cardinals won the World Series. And in 2007, the Colts won the Super Bowl. Out of those three titles, only one time was I on the phone with my Dad at the deciding moment with tears running down my face. When we lost Darryl Kile, and Jack Buck, and Josh Hancock in 2007, it felt a whole lot like we lost a very close friend.

Something about baseball just gets in me. There’s just something that sets it apart from all the other sports, all the other games. Today I really feel awful for Tiger fans who watched Mark Fidrych in his too-short career, and for all those Phillie fans who won’t ever hear that incredible voice call a live game again.

I love baseball.

Hunson themed it. Brad helped. Just a little though. A Tumblr Site